|
|
|
INTERVIEW - UMNEY'S LAST CASE
Why did you decide to write this screenplay?
As the author of crime novels, I was fascinated by the relationship
between a fictional detective and his creator. Stephen King
accurately and wickedly depicts the arrogance of writers who play
God with their characters, who are actually just projections of
themselves. The author in this story, Sam Landry, suffers enormously
because he has the hubris to mess with time and space - but all of
us as writers claim that as our territory. As in many Stephen King
stories, deep subconscious desires, such as Landry's wish to become
his own character, become actualized - with destructive
consequences.
What was the most challenging part of adapting this story into a
screenplay?
The story was structured loosely and written in first person,
neither of which are helpful elements for a screenplay. It wove
between time periods and events in an intuitive but not always
logical way, so I had to deconstruct the narrative and rebuild it
according to the linear requirements of film. It is quite a complex
meditation on identity, pride and punishment, and the writing life.
The challenge was to preserve Stephen King's voice and clarify his
intentions - and figure out a way to end the story that would work
on film.
You had to write different versions of the same person in
different time periods. How did you use this as a tool to separate
fantasy and reality, and how was it used to blend fantasy and
reality?
Umney's voice in 1938 was quite distinct from Sam Landry's jargon in
2005. Their points of view and goals were different. Umney's world
was stylized, and Landry's was realistic. So language played a large
part. And on screen, you'll see how the fabulous production values
we achieved by shooting in Australia delineate the two worlds.
How does Umney's Last Case differ from some of Stephen
King's well-known horrors, and how does it fit into his collective
body of work?
This is an intellectual maze in which the horror comes from the main
character's own ambitions, not an outside force or deranged
antagonist. What stands out is the theme of guilt and punishment,
specifically in terms of writers who are successful or somehow
overstep their bounds. |
|